High Swartz Attorney Don Petrille Joins Auditor General-Elect DeFoor’s PA Transition Team

High Swartz business attorney Don Petrille has been invited to serve on PA Auditor General-elect Tim DeFoor’s transition team. Mr. Petrille will be serving on the Legal Review segment of the team which will examine the status and scope of pending litigation and the extent of the auditor general’s authority. The team will also determine a legal strategy for the office, review existing legal staff, and pending human resource issues.

“I’m anxious to apply my knowledge of state, county and municipal governments to the legal issues faced by the auditor general’s office during a time of transition. Intergovernmental relations, between governmental branches, and within our state’s political subdivisions are significant issues. My combination of courtroom and business experience will serve the team well”, stated Mr. Petrille.

The auditor general’s transition team consists of five segments which will examine audits, performance audits, legal review, communications & government relations, and personnel & administrative operations. Mr. DeFoor is the former Dauphin County Controller who will succeed the current auditor general, Eugene DePasquale, who is term limited. Auditor general-elect DeFoor is the first person of color elected to a statewide row office.

As a Doylestown attorney, Mr. Petrille represents businesses through all phases of their development, starting with initial organization, through the operational stage, eventually ending with sale, merger, acquisition or dissolution. Don also advises clients on methods of wealth preservation, business succession planning, and purchase, sale, financing, leasing and improvement of real estate.

Before returning to full-time legal practice with High Swartz in 2020, Petrille served as the President of the Pennsylvania State Association of Elected County Officials, and the President of the Registers of Wills and Clerks of the Orphans’ Court Association of Pennsylvania. He served in county government as Register of Wills for eight years.

Business Interruption Insurance in PA – Are You Really Covered During the Pandemic?

Many business owners had insurance policies that included “business interruption” coverage. If the pandemic isn’t business interruption, what is?

As the global pandemic caused by COVID-19 swept into the United States and stay at home orders and mandatory business closures rolled out of governors’ offices like water over Niagara Falls, business owners, small, medium and large, sought out help from any source possible. Unfortunately, “business interruption” insurance policies have many exclusions and what a layperson would assume would be included is actually excluded from coverage.

Business Interruption in many cases is being linked to one thing

It seems as though the insurance industry linked arms and denied all claims for business interruption caused by the pandemic. Business interruption coverage is usually found in property coverage; meaning there must be property damage that causes the business interruption. The insurance carriers have taken the position that government shut down due to a virus is not covered.

What if a virus is not excluded in my policy? Is my business covered then?

Some policies do have specific exclusions for viruses and mold, among other things. But that raises the question, if a virus rises to the level of being specifically excluded in some policies, what if it is not excluded in my policy? Wouldn’t my losses be covered then? It depends on the type of policy and the language in the policy.

Courts in some jurisdictions have found that business interruption coverage is triggered where “property” is rendered unusable or unfit for its intended purpose, including being contaminated, even where there is no physical property damage.

Don’t throw away those receipts just yet

The approach taken by the insurance industry has given rise to numerous lawsuits seeking coverage under common business interruption clauses under several different theories. More than a dozen cases have already been filed seeking to have state and federal courts in various jurisdictions determine that losses due from closure as a result of the virus actually are included in these property damage policies. Some cases rely on the theory that the property is contaminated as a result of the virus. Some argue that under an “all-risk” policy closures due to orders of civil authorities are covered by the policy’s broad language.

States vs. Insurance Carriers

Not waiting for a decision in these pending cases, Travelers Insurance has filed a declaratory judgment action seeking an order that losses from temporary closures due to governmental actions taken to slow the spread of the pandemic did not result in property damage and was not covered by the Business Income loss provisions of its policy.

And numerous states, including Pennsylvania, have pending legislation to retroactively require insurance carriers to honor these claims (especially for small business owners) with compensation to the carriers coming from other funds.

This is still an ongoing fight, with points of law from prior litigation supporting both sides of the argument. How various courts decide the issue may determine whether business owners have valid claims under the terms of their own policies. It may still come down to the language in a specific type of policy and what exclusions are spelled out. But the approach initially taken of turning down all claims may not hold up. The courts may “deny” the carriers’ claims; an irony not lost on many.

As this is still an evolving issue, you may want stay in touch with your broker or counsel if you have business interruption insurance and you have losses due to state mandated closures. If you have questions regarding your coverage and whether or not you are covered, please contact Joel D. Rosen or one of the business attorneys here at High Swartz at 610.275.0700.

A Small Business Game Plan to Follow During the Coronavirus Outbreak

Feeling sick about your business during these uncertain times? Doylestown Attorney Donald Petrille offers a to-do list for small business owners that can help position themselves for what lies ahead.

The COVID-19 virus biggest casualty so far has been our small business community. Washington is working on a number of measures to give our small businesses some form of relief while business are in a forced shutdown in the name of public health. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act was initiated to help many businesses address their needs. Employment law attorney Jim Shrimp talks about it in more detail here. And if you feel the need to speak with a small business lawyer near you in Montgomery and Bucks Counties, we’re always available.

What can small businesses do right now to mitigate their issues?

We understand that small business often work on very thin margins, and they require a dynamic community to thrive. Entrepreneurs and business owners need to take action where they can. Below are several items our clients can do to mitigate the effects of the current economic environment on their businesses:

Contact you lender. Most lenders are working to create relief programs to keep their borrowers in business. Communication is always the best option when you face uncertainty.

Contact your insurance agent. Many of our clients have some form of business interruption insurance. This may be a time when it is effective. Some may even have force majeure clauses. These clauses can protect business owners from various events out of their control like a pandemic or tornado. Attorney Thomas Rees goes into fuller detail here.

Review your marketing plan. The current operating restrictions will not be in place forever. How can you position your business to grow and take advantage of pent-up demand once restrictions start to ease? Keeping your employees, clients, and customers informed should be your main priority. Take a look at your marketing expenses. A good rule of thumb is that if a marketing endeavor can’t be analyzed and reported, you never know if it’s worth your time and money. What parts of your marketing plan fall under that category?

Review your IT infrastructure. This may be an opportunity to review how you business receives and delivers services. There may be an opportunity to reduce overhead in the long term by changing your business model now.

Explore Relief Funds. The Commonwealth Financing Authority and Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority has identified new relief programs for small businesses.

Plan for the long term. See what operations and financial products you can restructure. Review and improve your staff capabilities. No one can predict what business will be like after this event. But it’s certain that this event will end and people will need certain services more than others. Successful business plans will address those needs.

Stay Informed. Go to sites such as SBA.gov and your state and federal legislators’ websites to get up to date information on the resources available to help your business through this uncertain time.

Talk to a Small Business Lawyer Near You Today

We know the future is uncertain. Together, we can get through this unique time and help each other prosper! If you are in need of legal services relating to what your small business game plan should be at this time, contact our law offices in Doylestown and Norristown. Call 610-275-0700 or email Don Petrille at dpetrille@highswartz.com.

How the Families First Coronavirus Response Act Will Affect Local Business

The Act seeks to address the impact of coronavirus in a number of areas, but how will it affect employees, employers and their businesses in PA?

On the night of Tuesday, March 17th, 2020, the President signed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. It was passed by Congress in hopes that it will assist Americans, especially in the areas of child nutrition and health. It will go into effect no later than April 2, 2020, and below is a brief summary of what it hopes to do for businesses.

What does the Act do for businesses and its employees?

The FFCR Act applies to employers with under 500 employees. Employers with under 50 employees are entitled to seek an exemption from the Department of Labor, if providing the benefits described herein would put the employer out of business.

The Act provides two new paid benefits which expire on December 31, 2020:

  1. A two-week paid sick leave for coronavirus related illness; and
  2. Up to 12 weeks of paid Family and Medical Leave for caring for a child whose school or child care provider has closed.

Who is eligible for paid sick leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act?

This benefit is for employees who are unable to work (or telework) because the employee:

  1. is subject to a governmentally-mandated quarantine or isolation order
  2. has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine
  3. has symptoms of being infected with coronavirus and is seeking a medical diagnosis
  4. is caring for an individual who is quarantined or self-quarantining
  5. is caring for a son or daughter if the school or place of care has been closed

If any of the circumstances above apply, the employee is eligible for two (2) weeks of full pay, based on his/her typical schedule. There is a maximum benefit of $511 per day.

What if the employee still has unused sick time or paid-time-off (PTO)?

If the employee has employer-based sick time/PTO, the employer is required to apply the government emergency leave, before applying the employer based benefit.

Who is eligible for paid family and medical leave?

This benefit is available for employees who are unable to work (or telework) because the employee must care for children (up to 18 years old) whose schools or child care facilities have closed because of the coronavirus.

The employee is eligible for up to 12 weeks of two-thirds pay, with health insurance. The maximum benefit is $200 per day and $10,000 total. The first two weeks of this leave may be unpaid (that gap is filled by the Paid Sick Leave benefit).

How Does an Employer get reimbursed under the Family First Coronavirus Response Act?

Both paid leaves are reimbursable to the employer via a payroll tax credit, which will be provided by the Federal government within 3 months. If the employer pays more in paid benefits and health insurance premiums than the payroll tax, the government will send the employer an “overpayment” check for the difference.

The coronavirus pandemic means news and information is constantly-changing and evolving every minute. The business lawyers at High Swartz know how important it is to keep everyone informed with current and valid information during these trying times. If you have questions about the Family First Coronavirus Response Act, or any pandemic-related query relating to your job or business, please contact our employment law attorneys at 610-275-0700 or email jshrimp@highswartz.com.

We know how hard hit our areas have been hit during this pandemic. Our local law offices in Montgomery County and Bucks County Pennsylvania can help guide those most affected by offering guidance at any time.

Employers: Does a Force Majeure Clause in Your Contract Cover You During the Coronavirus Pandemic?

The Coronavirus pandemic has upended our lives with little notice. Public events have stopped, schools and stores have closed, the financial markets have been volatile, and people are staying at home.

Amid this chaos and uncertainty, how do contracts cover employer emergencies like the Coronavirus? The answer may depend on whether your contract has a “force majeure” clause. Consider talking with a corporate attorney near you in Bucks or Montgomery Counties to make sure.

What is Force Majeure?

“Force majeure” is a French term for “unforeseeable circumstances that prevent completion of a contract”. A force majeure clause can excuse one or both parties from fulfilling a contract’s terms when an unforeseeable event occurs. The clause may either release the parties completely from performance or allow delayed or modified performance. The clause may also allow or limit refunds to parties that have made advance payments.

Not every contract has a force majeure clause. Force majeure clauses most often arise in commercial and real estate contracts. Where a contract lacks a force majeure clause, a party may seek an excuse from performance on other grounds, such as impossibility or frustration of performance.

But it is easier to use an actual event (such as a hurricane or in this case, a pandemic such as the COVID-19 outbreak resulting in guidelines enforced to stop the spread of the coronavirus) for relief from performance than a subjective factor such as impossibility or frustration of performance.

Is the shutdown of my company due to the coronavirus and COVID-19 outbreak covered under my policy?

A typical force majeure clause MAY cover some or all the following events:

  • Fire
  • natural or man-made disturbances
  • war
  • Acts of terrorism
  • nuclear incidents
  • riots
  • Insurrections (a violent uprising against an authority or government)
  • strikes
  • boycotts
  • lockouts
  • criminal activity
  • hurricanes, tornadoes, storms, blizzards or earthquakes
  • weather emergencies such as extreme cold or heat
  • explosions
  • pandemics
  • health or environmental emergencies
  • embargoes
  • power outages
  • actions of a governmental agency
  • other cause beyond the parties’ control

This list includes several Coronavirus-related events such as pandemics, health or environmental emergencies, or actions of governmental agencies.

The types of events covered by force majeure clauses break down into human-caused events or “Acts of Man”( war, terrorism, riots, strikes); natural events or “Acts of God” (floods, hurricanes, tornadoes); events with both human and natural origins (fires, explosions, pandemics); or circumstances imposed by humans to deal with emergencies (governmental actions).

It is important that a force majeure clause is drafted precisely. The clause should focus on objective events.

For example, if a hurricane hits a community, it is easier to invoke force majeure if the clause mentions hurricanes, not just an “emergency” (which may depend on a third party’s declaration) or events beyond a party’s control. It’s always easier to point to a specific natural event, without having to argue whether events really were beyond a party’s control.

For example, if a tidal flood damages an auto dealer’s inventory, it’s far quicker to say “A flood took place” than to have to speculate on whether the dealer could have controlled the damage by moving the cars inland.

“It Can’t Happen Here”

Drafters of force majeure clauses should avoid the tendency to say, “It can’t happen here”, particularly for natural disasters. Major tornadoes have occurred in Massachusetts, disastrous floods have hit the fairly dry Dakotas, and the East Coast is among the more earthquake-prone regions in the country. It’s more prudent to assume that “Anything can happen”, and to describe a large group of events in the clause.

After the emergency occurs, the victim of the unforeseen event should give prompt notice to the other parties of the invocation of the force majeure clause. The victim should explain why the performance of the contract is totally or partly impossible. If partial performance can take place, it is advisable to work out a plan with the other party for limited performance: will delivery dates be postponed; will deliveries be smaller; will services be provided in another location? The parties should then reduce the plan to a signed written amendment to the contract.

The party invoking the force majeure clause will always need to account for its own performance. This requires a showing that every effort has been made to comply with the contract before the emergency and that the performance has truly been prevented by the unexpected event. The courts will look closely to see if the party seeking excuse from performance was performing the contract before the emergency. The courts will not favor a party who uses a force majeure clause to avoid performing a contract that the party was already handling poorly.

If your business has been affected by the COVID-19 outbreak or has ceased operations due to government guidelines, you may need a corporate attorney to examine your contracts. Contact the Business Law, Employment Law, or Commercial Litigation Attorneys here at High Swartz. We can help make sense of your rights under a force majeure clause. Call 610-275-0700 or fill out our contact form.

Mark R. Fischer, Jr. Elected Partner at High Swartz

High Swartz is pleased to announce that Mark R. Fischer, Jr. has been elected a partner at the law firm.

Mark R. Fischer, Jr. joined High Swartz in 2009 and has focused his practice primarily on representing businesses in breach of contract, payment collection, construction defect, and consumer protection disputes throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

“We are pleased to welcome Mark as the newest partner at High Swartz” said High Swartz Managing Partner Joel D. Rosen. “ His hard work and dedication to his clients and the firm make this a well-deserved achievement. It’s my pleasure to personally congratulate Mark and look forward to his continued growth at High Swartz.”

Mark also represents local municipalities, property owners, and individuals in zoning and land development matters, local code enforcement proceedings, real estate disputes, business transactions, and general civil litigation. Mark has significant experience in both the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Courts.

Mark grew up in Lower Bucks County and now lives in Montgomery County with his wife and three children. He attended college at Widener University and obtained his law degree from Villanova University. He has been recognized by Super Lawyers as a top-rated civil litigation attorney and serves as Chair of the Montgomery County Law Reporter Committee.

“Over the years here at High Swartz, I’ve developed great relationships with my fellow attorneys and our staff, and I really appreciate all that they have done to help me get to this point in my legal career” states Mark Fischer. “This is truly a wonderful place to practice law and I am honored to become a partner at this fine law firm.”

Starting or Relocating a Business: Watch Out for Local Requirements!

Anyone who starts or relocates a business goes through exciting and challenging times.  It is understandable that the business owner’s primary focus  is getting established and meeting customer needs.  It stands to reason that a business plan will include big picture items such as marketing strategy and customer satisfaction, which in turn may lead to profits and success.

But there are many other issues to consider, some of which even experienced business owners overlook.  An important part of the original due diligence process and planning period should be attention to the local rules and regulations.  If proper attention is not given to local regulations, the business can have difficulty down the road.  That is why it is important for any person contemplating a change in business location or starting a business to consult not only an experienced financial professional but an experienced municipal attorney.

Three important areas of local regulations are taxation, zoning and land use.  This blog will deal with tax issues.  Zoning and land use issues arise earlier in the process, when a business buys or leases land.  Local ordinances may include additional protections beyond federal or state law (e.g., LGBT), but the pattern of regulation is similar to the federal or state regulations.

But taxation can be a trap for the unwary.  When choosing a business location, business organizers often consult with accountants and financial planners who are familiar with federal and state taxes.  These businesses assume that their consultants are familiar with local tax laws.  But this may not be a correct assumption.  The business owner needs to ask whether there are local taxes or registration requirements to be concerned about.  The answer may be yes and should be answered as soon as possible and before the doors open for business.

Pennsylvania is unique in that it consists of 67 individual counties and 2,500 municipalities – cities, townships and boroughs, each with their own ordinances and regulations.  Allegheny County, containing Pittsburgh, has 130 municipalities!  The four suburban Philadelphia counties contain 238 municipalities, ranging from Chester County’s 73 down to Delaware County’s 49.

Of the Commonwealth’s 2,500 plus municipalities and over 500 school districts, 90% impose Earned Income Tax and 80% impose a Local Services Tax (formerly Occupational Privilege Tax or Municipal and Emergency Services Tax).  These taxes are paid by employees but must be collected and remitted by the employer or the employer may be responsible for penalty, interest and perhaps fines.  The passage of Act 32 of 2008 providing for Central Tax Collection Committees on the County level made the payment, collection and disbursement of Earned Income Tax easier for all parties.  But even this statute requires employers  to collect the taxes from employees and quarterly remit the taxes to the correct county, failure to do so will result in interest and possibly penalty imposed on the employer.

It is at least as important that each business know the registration and tax requirements of any municipality in which it does business.   Failure to register a business when required and remit Business Privilege and Mercantile License Tax (business taxes) can result in penalty and interest assessments by the municipality.  These taxes are often overlooked when starting a new business or moving an existing business because less than 10% of all municipalities in Pennsylvania impose Business Taxes.  The taxes are self reporting, and the responsibility for filing and reporting falls on each business.  It is imperative when moving or starting a business, especially in southeastern Pennsylvania, to consult with an experienced municipal attorney who can guide you through the process of making sure you are properly registered and ready to pay any taxes the way they should be paid to avoid any unnecessary penalty and interest.  This will help you keep your focus on the reason you are in business to begin with – your success and the satisfaction of your customers.

At High Swartz, our business and corporate law attorneys provide businesses of all types and sizes with efficient and precise commercial law solutions. For more information or if you have any questions, please contact Kathleen M. Thomas at 215-345-8888 or kthomas@highswartz.com.

The information above is general: we recommend that you consult an attorney regarding your specific circumstances.  The content of this information is not meant to be considered as legal advice or a substitute for legal representation.

Small business owners: Beware these recent developments in PA law!

For small business owners, the growth of a startup business can cause you to overlook the legal minutiae that come along the way.  It is not unusual to see small businesses that started out using form contracts or invoices that may have done the trick at the time, but ten or more years later they remain unchanged, without any new terms or conditions to accommodate the growth of the business.  The business may have started selling goods or services in a relatively small, local area, then before they know it, especially in the digital age, they are selling goods or services across State borders.  But have they considered whether those initial contract forms sufficiently address the needs of the expanded business?  Or whether the contracts and business practices comply with the laws of the jurisdiction in which they are selling?  As an example of unexpected issues that may arise, below are summaries of two interesting decisions that the Pennsylvania Courts have issued this year.

In February, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a decision in Danganan v. Guardian Protection Services,[1] in which a customer (Danganan) purchased a home security system and services from Guardian Protection Services, a Pennsylvania business, for his residence in Washington, D.C.  The service contract had an initial term of three years.  Before the three years expired, Danganan moved and sold his residence in D.C., but Guardian continued to bill him and collect for the remainder due under the contract.  Danganan sued Guardian in Pennsylvania and asserted a claim under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (“UTPCPL”), which allows consumers to pursue triple damages and attorney’s fees for deceptive business practices.  Guardian tried to get the UTPCPL claim dismissed, arguing that the law did not apply to non-Pennsylvania residents or transactions outside of Pennsylvania.  Ultimately the case was submitted to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which determined that a non-Pennsylvania resident may bring suit under the UTPCPL against a Pennsylvania business based on transactions that occurred out-of-state.

This decision should remind Pennsylvania business owners to confirm that its consumer contracts for transactions both inside and outside of Pennsylvania are compliant with the provisions of the UTPCPL and any regulations emanating from that law.  For those newer businesses still filling out those initial forms from the startup days, it is time to have a qualified attorney take a look and make any necessary revisions to properly protect the business.

In addition, in June the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a decision in Webb-Benjamin, LLC v. International Rug Group, LLC,[2] which involved a dispute over a commission payment.  Webb-Benjamin, a Pennsylvania company, entered into a contract with International Rug Group, a Connecticut company, to provide services for a furniture sale in Canada.  Before the furniture sale ended, the two parties decided to terminate their contract but agreed that Webb-Benjamin would be paid its final commission at the end of the Canadian furniture sale.  Shortly after the termination, but before the end of the sale, International Rug registered to do business in Pennsylvania.  When International Rug failed to pay the commission, Webb-Benjamin sued in Pennsylvania to collect.  International Rug attempted to get the case dismissed on the grounds that the Pennsylvania Courts had no jurisdiction over the Connecticut company.  The Pennsylvania Superior Court disagreed and ruled that when an out-of-state company registers to do business in Pennsylvania, it consents to the jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Courts, even for disputes that arose before the company’s registration.

This decision is pertinent to both Pennsylvania businesses and out-of-state companies that do business in Pennsylvania.  For Pennsylvania companies, the case may provide a basis to sue in Pennsylvania for disputes with out-of-state companies.  For non-Pennsylvania companies, the case points out another factor to consider when deciding to register to do business in Pennsylvania.

For all companies, these cases are a reminder to: (1) research the legal requirements for expanding the company’s business into other States, and (2) always have an attorney review the company’s contracts and transaction documents to assure that they include provisions that will best allow the company to grow and avoid undesired consequences.

Decisions made and actions taken during the process of business formation will have a significant effect on the owner’s exposure to personal and professional liability and the company’s profitability. At High Swartz LLP our attorneys have extensive experience in a wide range of industries, and provide investors, entrepreneurs and businesses in transition with sophisticated legal counsel designed to protect and promote the new and restructured businesses. As your counsel, we will help you make the right decisions and will implement necessary legal measures on your behalf, allowing you to focus on business management. For more information or if you have any questions, please contact Mark R. Fischer, Jr. at 610-275-0700 or mfischer@highswartz.com.

The information above is general: we recommend that you consult an attorney regarding your specific circumstances.  The content of this information is not meant to be considered as legal advice or a substitute for legal representation.

[1] 179 A.3d 9 (Pa. 2018).

[2] 2018 WL 3153602 (2018 PA Super 187).

Joel D. Rosen Appointed to the Montgomery Bar Foundation Board of Trustees

High Swartz managing partner, Joel D. Rosen has been appointed to the Board of the Trustees for the Montgomery Bar Foundation. Mr. Rosen has been reappointed for a 3-year term.

The Montgomery Bar Foundation is the charitable affiliate of the Montgomery Bar Association. Since 1987, the Bar Foundation has supported law-related educational, charitable, and humanitarian projects throughout Montgomery County. Grants awarded by the Foundation have been used to help the elderly, homeless, victims of domestic violence, troubled and underprivileged youth, and many other individuals and families in need. Visit their website at http://www.montgomerybarfoundation.org/index.html.

Joel D. Rosen is Managing Partner of High Swartz LLP. With more than 30 years of legal experience, his areas of practice include franchise law, business and commercial law, employment law, trademark/copyright law and commercial leasing. Mr. Rosen has counseled numerous businesses with regard to general corporate and commercial transactions, including, formation, mergers & acquisitions, licensing, sales, and financing projects. Mr. Rosen’s corporate client base spans a broad spectrum of industries, including: biotechnology, franchise, weight loss, food and restaurant, consumer products, media and entertainment, software and technology and nonprofit organizations.

About High Swartz LLP: High Swartz LLP is a full-service law firm serving clients in the Delaware Valley and throughout Pennsylvania from offices in Norristown and Doylestown. Established in 1914, High Swartz serves the needs of businesses, municipalities, government entities, nonprofits and individuals. With offices in Bucks County and Montgomery County, the full-service law firm provides comprehensive counsel and legal support to individuals and business entities of all sizes across a broad spectrum of industries throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey. For more information, go to www.highswartz.com.

# # #

Be Wary of “Binding Mediation”

Over the last 100 years, High Swartz attorneys have engaged in countless cases involving alternative dispute resolution, representing litigants in arbitrations and mediations and serving as arbitrators and mediators.   Recently however, I have noticed a newer concept being incorporated into contractual provisions and settlement discussions:  “binding mediation”.  Such a provision raises immediate questions.  What is binding mediation?  Is this something that a party should agree to?

While not widely used, or even widely known about, binding mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution.  Alternate dispute resolution is, generally speaking, a collection of methods of resolving disputes outside of court.  In the arbitration method of alternate dispute resolution, the parties conduct a evidentiary hearing before a neutral arbitrator, or panel of arbitrators, that decides the case as would a judge and jury.  Except in very limited circumstances, and unless the parties expressly agree otherwise, the parties are bound by the arbitrator’s decision, and there are very limited rights of appeal.  The arbitrator’s decision can be entered as a judgment in court, the judgment can be enforced, and assets of the losing party can be seized to satisfy the judgment  In a mediation, there is no evidentiary hearing.  A neutral mediator listens to the various positions of the parties and facilitates their settlement discussions.  In mediation, there is no “decision” to be binding.  The culmination of the mediation is either a settlement acceptable to both parties, a partial settlement acceptable to both parties, or the parties leave without their dispute resolved.

“Binding mediation” therefore would seem to be a contradiction in terms, and is often discarded as a viable option.   There is no statutory definition or even universal understanding of what binding mediation even means.  Some consider it to be a traditional mediation, except that the parties are expressly bound by any agreement they reach.  Others consider it to be a traditional mediation, but if the parties do not settle, the mediator determines the final settlement somewhere at or between the final positions of the parties.  Still others believe it is simply another term for arbitration.

Case law highlights that the term is vague.  In Pennsylvania, the Superior Court addressed binding mediation in its unreported decision Miller v. Miller, 2016 WL 6301602 (Pa.Super. 2016), when it found that because the parties used the word “binding” it meant that they were agreeing to an arbitration, despite the use of the word “mediation.”  In Connecticut, the Appellate Court found in the case of Tirreno v. The Hartford, 129 A.3d 735 (Conn.App.Ct. 2015) that binding mediation was not an arbitration, and thus not subject to that state’s Arbitration Statute, particularly since there was no hearing.  However, the mediation decision in Tirreno was nonetheless found binding in the context of a petition to enforce a settlement that was pending was before the court.

While there is no clear accepted definition, what is clear is that if you are going to enter into a binding mediation agreement, simply referencing the process by name is not sufficient to protect your rights.  You must clearly set forth how the process will be conducted, how the decision will be treated, and how the decision will be enforced.

Is it a good idea to enter into a binding mediation agreement?  Since you are potentially giving up your rights to a hearing, to examine and challenge evidence and the ability to cross examine witnesses, it would seem that it is rarely a good choice, particularly in an agreement addressing prospective disputes.  However, binding mediation may be appropriate in some circumstances, such as when a dispute has arisen, there are relatively few material facts in dispute, there is a clear mutual understanding of each party’s positions and the scope of the mediator’s authority (such as monetary limits) is clearly defined.

If you have any questions about binding mediation, please contact Richard C. Sokorai at 610-275-0700 or rsokorai@highswartz.com. Our Bucks County and Montgomery County Litigation attorneys  have knowledge and experience in all facets of arbitration and mediation.

The information above is general: we recommend that you consult an attorney regarding your specific circumstances.  The content of this information is not meant to be considered as legal advice or a substitute for legal representation.